The art of image processing in nanoscience

These slides were prepared by Philip Moriarty to address comments made by “Unregistered” in the discussion thread of our article at PubPeer


  1. Man, I remember “nanoscience” being hype-ish 15 years ago. You would think something would have progressed in the field, but I’m seeing the exact same patterns of behavior now as what we saw in late 90s, early 00s. Way too much silliness and money being poured into this junk. Please, please, let it become passé. (And then real scientists can actually learn more about surface features, colloids, etc. Maybe coming at it from a catalysis or 3-5 semiconductor background. Not this nanowire, stripy, plastic fantastic junk by press release chemists who can’t do physics or math.)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.