Research misconduct in the UK

Time to act say COPE Chair, Liz Wager, and BMJ editor in chief, Fiona Godlee, who discuss the lack of systems in place to investigate research misconduct in the UK. The editorial is published in the BMJ and is also available here; excerpt:

The meeting will hear that research misconduct is alive and well
in the UK even when tightly defined as intentional acts of
falsification and fabrication. It is almost certainly flourishing
when defined more broadly—as some are now arguing it should
be 12—to include a wide range of questionable behaviours that
threaten the integrity of science, including suppression of data
and failure to publish research results.



One comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.